IFC CARO 2016 and other reporting requirements by auditor


 IFC : existence, adequacy and operating effectiveness of an internal financial control system

IFC definition as per Companies Act
Internal financial controls means Policies and procedures adopted by the company for ensuring orderly and efficient conduct of its business
Including
– Adherence to company’s policies
– the safeguarding of its assets
– the Prevention and detection of frauds and errors
– the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and
– The timely preparation of reliable financial information

What is required?

• A demonstrable documented framework for internal financial controls
• Documentation of controls that actually mitigate the risk of significant misstatements
• Requisite accountability for financial reporting structure
• Fraud risks and controls at the process level to be understood and are demonstrable
• Testing of operating effectiveness of controls



Statutory Provisions under Companies Act 2013 related to Internal Financial Control
Statutory Provisions
Area
Regulatory mandate
Applicability
Section 134 (5)(e) of Companies Act 2013
Directors Responsibility Statement
Board of Directors have to confirm that they have laid down IFC and that such IFC are adequate and were operating effectively.
Listed Entities
Section 177 of Companies Act 2013
Audit Committee
Should evaluate IFC and risk management systems. Call on the auditors to comment on IFC.
All Entities having an Audit committee
Section 149 (7), Schedule IV of the Companies Act 2013
Independent directors
Should satisfy themselves on the integrity of financial information and that financial controls and systems of risk management are robust and defensible
All Entities having independent directors
Section 143 (3)(i) of Companies Act 2013*
Auditors Report
Auditors have to report whether the company has adequate internal financial controls and the operating effectiveness of such controls
All Entities (Listed/ unlisted)
Rule 8 (5) of Companies Accounts Rules
Board of Directors report
The details in respect of adequacy of internal financial controls with reference to financial statements
All Entities (Listed /Unlisted)



Comparison of Provisions with Companies Act 2013





Analysis

Directors of listed companies and auditors of every company have to confirm/ report the existence, adequacy and operating effectiveness of an internal financial control system. This could be viewed as an extension of the requirement under the amended CARO -Companies (Auditor’s) Report 2004 to make directors and auditors directly responsible.

The provisions related to internal financial control bear a striking resemblance to the Assessment of Important Financial Manual and Automated Controls under the US Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act.

However, there is a stark contrast too, as the latter applies only to large publicly-listed companies while the former applies to the audit of every company. As the cost of testing such controls is disproportionately higher for smaller companies, the US Securities and Exchange Commission has exempted listed companies that are neither accelerated nor large accelerated filers.

Implementation of the provision in its current form would lead to chaos as there are no standards yet for auditing the existence and operating effectiveness of controls and the reporting obligations of auditors. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs needs to rethink and go in for phased implementation.











Financial reporting Controls VS  Operational Controls






CARO

Particulars
CARO, 2015
CARO, 2016
Change
Remark
Fixed Assets
i(a) whether the company is maintaining proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative
details and situation of fixed assets;
i(a) Whether the company is maintaining proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets;
No Change
------

i(b) whether these fixed assets have been physically verified by the management at reasonable intervals;
whether any material discrepancies were noticed on such verification and if so, whether the same have been properly dealt with in the books of account;
i(b) Whether these fixed assets have been physically verified by the management at reasonable intervals; whether any material discrepancies were noticed on such verification and if so, whether the same have been properly dealt with in the books of account;
No Change
------

No clause
i(c)Whether title deeds of immovable properties are held in the name of the company. If not, provide details thereof.
New clause is introduce for immovable property only
Cases may be arises in which title deeds are registered in the name of holding company and used by the subsidiary company.  
Inventories
ii(a) whether physical verification of inventory has been conducted at reasonable intervals by the
management;

ii(b) are the procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by the management reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the company and the nature of its business. If not, the inadequacies in such procedures should be reported;

iii(c) whether the company is maintaining proper records of inventory and whether any material discrepancies
were noticed on physical verification and if so, whether the same have been properly dealt with in the books
of account;

ii(a) Whether physical verification of inventory has been conducted at reasonable intervals by the management and whether any material discrepancies were noticed and if so, how they have been dealt with in the books of account;
1. No need to comment on procedure followed by the management is reasonable or not according to the size of the company.

2. no need to comment on company is maintaining proper records of inventory or not.
Auditor need to collect necessary evidences to ensure that physical verification of inventory has been conducted at reasonable intervals by the management and discrepancies were noticed has been dealt with in the books of account.
Loan Granted
iii. whether the company has granted any loans, secured or unsecured to companies, firms or other parties
covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act. If so,
iii. Whether the company has granted any loans, secured or unsecured to companies, firms or other parties covered by clause (76) of Section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013. If so,
Register maintained under section 189 is replaced by clause (76) of Section 2
------

No Cause
iii(a) Whether the terms and conditions of the grant of such loans are not prejudicial to the company’s interest;



Auditor verify loan agreement, resolution passed and various other documents related to loan granted like adequate margin for security of loan etc
iii(a) whether receipt of the principal amount and interest are also regular; and
iii(b) Whether receipt of the principal amount and interest are regular. If not provide details thereof; and

iii(b) if overdue amount is more than rupees one lakh, whether reasonable steps have been taken by the
company for recovery of the principal and interest;
iii(c) If overdue amount is more than rupees five lakhs, whether reasonable steps have been taken by the company for recovery of the principal and interest;

Overall limit increased from one lakh to five lakhs
Auditor of the company need to verify terms & conditions mentioned in loan agreements, resolutions passed to check overall limits.
Loans, Investments and gurantees
No Clause
(iv) In respect of loans, investments and guarantees, whether provisions of Section 185 and 186 of the Companies Act, 2013 have been complied with. If not, provide details thereof.
New clause
Auditor need to examine minutes of the Board meetings and related parties register and other documents.   
Internal Control
(iv) is there an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the company and the nature
of its business, for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. Whether
there is a continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal control system.
No Clause
Clause not included
ICAI release guidance notes on Internal Financial Control.
Deposit
in case the company has accepted deposits, whether the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of
India and the provisions of sections 73 to 76 or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act and
the rules framed thereunder, where applicable, have been complied with? If not, the nature of
contraventions should be stated; If an order has been passed by Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any court or any other tribunal, whether the same has
been complied with or not?
in case the company has accepted deposits, whether the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of sections 73 to 76 or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and the rules framed thereunder, where applicable, have been complied with? If not, the nature of such contraventions be stated; If an order has been passed by Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any court or any other tribunal, whether the same has been complied with or not?
No change
Definition of the deposit as per companies act is so wider like advance received from customers and not adjusted up to or more than 365 days become included under the definition of deposit. Various other transactions are fall under that category.
Cost Records
(vi) Where maintenance of cost records has been specified by the Central Government under sub-section
(1) of section 148 of the Companies Act, whether such accounts and records have been made and
maintained;
(vi) Whether maintenance of cost records has been specified by the Central Government under sub-section (1) of section 148 of the Companies Act, 2013 and whether such accounts and records have been so made and maintained;
No Change
Companies(Cost Records and Audit) Rules, 2014
Statutory dues
(vii)(a) is the company regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including provident fund,
employees’ state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, wealth tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise,
value added tax, cess and any other statutory dues with the appropriate authorities and if not, the extent of
the arrears of outstanding statutory dues as at the last day of the financial year concerned for a period of
more than six months from the date they became payable, shall be indicated by the auditor.
(vii)(a) whether the company is regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employees' state insurance, income-tax, sales-Lax, , service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax, and any other statutory dues with the appropriate authorities and if not, the extent of the arrears of outstanding statutory dues as at the last day of the financial year concerned for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable, shall be indicated by the auditor.
No Change
------

(vii)(b) in case dues of income tax or sales tax or wealth tax or service tax or duty of customs or duty of excise
or value added tax or cess have not been deposited on account of any dispute, then the amounts involved
and the forum where dispute is pending shall be mentioned. (A mere representation to the concerned
Department shall not constitute a dispute).
(vii)(b) Where dues of income tax or sales tax or service tax or duty of customs or duty of excise or value added tax have not been deposited on account of any dispute, then the amounts involved and the forum where dispute is pending shall be mentioned. (A mere representation to the concerned Department shall not be treated as a dispute).
No Change
------

(vii)(c) whether the amount required to be transferred to investor education and protection fund in accordance
with the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and rules made thereunder has been
transferred to such fund within time.
No Clause
Clause not included
Auditor need to take written representation from management to ensure that appropriate amount required to transfer is transferred to comply provision of the Act.
Net Worth
(viii) whether in case of a company which has been registered for a period not less than five years, its
accumulated losses at the end of the financial year are not less than fifty per cent of its net worth and
whether it has incurred cash losses in such financial year and in the immediately preceding financial year;
No Clause
Clause not included
Auditor of the company need to comment on going concern of the company.
Default in Repayment
(ix) whether the company has defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial institution or bank or debenture
holders? If yes, the period and amount of default to be reported;
(viii) Whether the company has defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial institution or bank or debenture holders? If yes, the period and amount of default to be reported (in case of banks and financial institutions, lender wise details to be provided).
(in case of banks and financial institutions, lender wise details to be provided)
Auditor of the
Guarantee
(x) whether the company has given any guarantee for loans taken by others from bank or financial
institutions, the terms and conditions whereof are prejudicial to the interest of the company;
No Clause
Clause not included
------
Term Loan/ Money raised
(xi) whether term loans were applied for the purpose for which the loans were obtained;
(ix) Whether moneys raised by way of public issue/ follow-on offer (including debt instruments) and term loans were applied for the purposes for which those are raised. If not, the details together with delays / default and subsequent rectification, if any, as may be applicable, be reported;
Whether moneys raised by way of public issue/ follow-on offer (including debt instruments). Further details together with delays / default and subsequent rectification, if any, as may be applicable, be reported;
Auditor comment on continues default as well as defaults rectified by the company
Fraud
(xii) whether any fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the year; If yes, the nature
and the amount involved is to be indicated.
(x) Whether any fraud by the company or any fraud on the Company by its officers/ employees has been noticed or reported during the year; If yes, the nature and the amount involved be indicated.
Under the CARO, 2016 specified that fraud by its officers/ employees.
ICAI issued Revised Guidance Note on Reporting on Fraud under Section 143(12).
Managerial Remuneration
No Clause
(ix) Whether managerial remuneration has been paid / provided in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of section 197 read with schedule V to the Companies Act? If not, state the amount involved and steps taken by the company for securing refund of the same.
New Clause
Special take care is taken in case of private limited company.
Nidhi Company
No Clause
(xii) Whether the Nidhi Company has complied with the Net Owned Fund in the ratio of 1: 20 to meet out the liability and whether the Nidhi Company is maintaining 10% liquid assets to meet out the unencumbered liability.
New Caluse
------
Related Parties Transactions
No Clause
(xiii) Whether all transactions with the related parties are in compliance with Section 188 and 177 of Companies Act, 2013 where applicable and the details have been disclosed in the Financial Statements etc as required by the accounting standards and Companies Act, 2013.
New Clause
Auditor of the company verify AOC-2, minutes of the board meeting and other documents to ensure that all related parties transaction are disclosed in Financial Statement
Preferential allotment / Private placement
No Clause
(xiv) Whether the company has made any preferential allotment / private placement of shares or fully or partly convertible debentures during the year under review and if so, as to whether the requirement of Section 42 of the Companies Act, 2013 have been complied and the amount raised have been used for the purposes for which the funds were raised. If not, provide details thereof.
New Clause
Companies Act, 2013 has made various new changes to allot securities of the company like offer letter requirements etc.
Non-cash Transactions
No clause
(xv) Whether the company has entered into any non-cash transactions with directors or persons connected with him and if so, whether provisions of Section 192 of Companies Act, 2013 have been complied with.
New Clause
All non-cash transaction are covert under this clause like Car, flats etc given by company. 







CARO 2015












Clauses Removed





 Particulars
CARO, 2015
Comparison with CARO 2003
(i) Reporting on maintaining, verifying and disposing off the fixed assets
(a) whether the company is maintaining proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets;

(b) whether these fixed assets have been physically verified by the management at reasonable intervals; whether any material discrepancies were noticed on such verification and if so, whether the same have been properly dealt with in the books of account;
Requirement to report disposing off of substantial part of fixed assets during the year, if any, has been done away with.
(ii) Physical Verification and maintenance of records of Inventories
(a) whether physical verification of inventory has been conducted at reasonable intervals by the management;
(b) are the procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by the management reasonable and adequate in relation tothe size of the company and thenature of its business. If not, the inadequacies in such procedures should be reported;

(c) whether the company is maintaining proper records of inventory and whether any material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification and if so, whether the same have been properly dealt with in the books of account;
Same Provision
(iii) Reporting on repayment of loans granted by the Company
Whether the company has granted any loans, secured or unsecured to companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act. If so,(a) whether receipt of the principal amount and interest are also regular; and 
(b) if overdue amount is more than rupees one lakh, whether reasonable steps have been taken by the company for recovery of the principal and interest;
·   Reporting of loans taken by the Company not included in CARO, 2015.

  Reporting on rates charged not required under CARO, 2015 as company will charge as per Section 186 (7). 
(iv) Internal control System
Is there an adequate internal control system commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its business, for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and services. Whether there is a continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal control system.
Reporting on adequate internal control procedure for sale of services also included under CARO, 2015
Transactions entered by the company in which the director(s) is/are interested
No such provision
·         Reporting on whether transactions in which directors are interested and pricing of these transactions are not required.·    
   Act, 2013 mandates Audit Committee to review all related party transactions inter-alia determining whether the same has been conducted on arm’s length basis on not. Merely charging at prevailing market price is no more the criteria. Entire transaction needs to be on arm’s length basis. 
(v) Acceptance of deposits
In case the company has accepted deposits, whether the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of sections 73 to 76 or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act and the rules framed there under, where applicable, have been complied with? If not, the nature of contraventions should be stated;If an order has been passed by   Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any court or any other tribunal, whether the same has been complied with or not? 
Same provision
Internal Audit System
No such provision
The purpose of internal audit is to identify that whether the compliance system is adequate commensurate with the size of the company. Act, 2013 mandates the Directors to report the same under Director’s Responsibility Statement under Section 134.
(vi) Cost Records
Where maintenance of cost records has been specified by central Government under sub-section (l) of section 148 of the Companies Act, whether such accounts and records have been made and maintained.
Same Provision
(vii) Payment of applicable taxes
(a) is the company regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employees’ state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, wealth tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax cess and any other statutory dues with the appropriate authorities and ii not, the extent of the arrears of outstanding statutory dues as at the last day of the financial year concerned for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable, shall be indicated by the auditor.(b) in case dues of income tax or sales tax or wealth tax or service tax or duty of customs or duty of excise or value added tax or cess have not been deposited on account of any dispute, then the amounts involved and the forum where dispute is pending shall be mentioned.

(A mere representation to the concerned Department shall not constitute a dispute)

(c) whether the amount required to be transferred to investor education and protection fund in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and rules made thereunder has been transferred to such fund within time.
CARO, 2015 mandates the reporting whether amount required to be transferred to investor education and protection fund in accordance with the relevant provisions of   the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and rules made thereunder has been transferred to such fund within time.
(viii) Accumulated losses
Whether in case of a company which has been registered for a period not less than five years, its accumulated losses at the end of the financial year are not less than fifty per cent of its net worth and whether it has incurred cash losses in such financial year and in the immediately preceding financial year;
Same Provision
(ix) Default in repayment of dues
Whether the company has defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial institution or bank or debenture holders? If yes, the period and amount of default to be reported.
Same Provision
Records required to be maintained by the company
No Such Provision
CARO, 2015 does not mandate reporting of the same as pledge of shares has been included in the definition of charge and the   auditor can assess the same by viewing relevant forms for the same.
Compliance of special statue provisions
No such provision
Records maintained
No such provision
(x) Guarantee for loan taken
Whether the company has given any guarantee for loans taken by others from bank or financial institutions, the terms and conditions whereof are prejudicial to the interest of the company.
Same Provision
(xi) Applicability of term loan
Whether term loans were applied for the purpose for which the loans were obtained.
Same Provision
Details of funds raised
No such provision
Preferential Allotment and determination of arm’s length price
No such provision
Act, 2013 mandates under Section 62 (1) (c) obtaining valuation report for preferential allotment made, which takes care of pricing issue. Thus, the same has not been included under CARO, 2015
Creation of security
No such provision
End-use of money raised
No such provision
(xii) Reporting of fraud
Whether any fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the year; If yes, the nature and the amount involved is to be indicated.
Same Provision
Reasons to be stated for unfavourable or qualified answers
·     Where, in the auditor’s report, the answer to any of the questions referred to in paragraph 3 is unfavorable or qualified, the auditor’s report shall also state the reasons for such unfavorable or qualified answer, as the case may be.·      

   Where the auditor is unable to express any opinion in answer to a particular question, his report shall indicate such fact together with the reasons why it is not possible for him to give an answer to such question.
Same Provision



Auditing Standards


New Companies Act Compliance Check List





Other Reporting Requirements by Auditors 


 AUDITOR’S REPORT ON CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 -ANNOUNCEMENT BY ICAI
The Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, under the authority of the Council, has already issued the illustrative formats of the auditor’s report on standalone financial statements of a company under the Companies Act 2013 in December 2014. While reporting on the consolidated financial statements (CFS) of a company under the Companies Act 2013, the auditors may draw guidance from the aforementioned formats and suitably reword the same, as required, to meet the circumstances of audit of CFS. The auditors of CFS, while reporting in respect of the provisions of, inter alia, section 143(3) and section 143(11) of the Companies Act, 2013 in their report on CFS, are also advised to:
  • consider the observations and comments as given in this regard in the auditors’ reports of the component auditors. 
  • include in their report or draw suitable reference to, negative/adverse comments, if any, in respect of section 143(3) and section 143(11) of the Act relating to a component, as appearing in the component auditors’ report.
The auditors of CFS are also advised to apply concept of materiality and professional judgment as provided in the Standards on Audit while reporting on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following illustrative formats of an auditors’ report on CFS, covering some of the clauses of section 143(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 (and where the auditor does not have the responsibility for reporting on internal financial controls over financial reporting under section 143(3)(i) of the Companies Act, 2013), are being issued herewith just to provide a broad guidance on how such a report may be prepared. These formats may be applied for the FY 2014-15 and until further announcement. It is reiterated that the auditors of CFS may suitably reword/redraft these formats to suit the circumstances of their audit engagement.
Type of Format

Unmodified opinion on the consolidated financial statements
(click here to download the format)
This format will be added in the Appendix to SA 700
Modified opinion on the consolidated financial statements
(click here to download the format)
This format will be added in the Appendix to SA 705





Guidence Note on Reporting of Fraud by statutory auditors to central government under 
section 143(12)

Under section 143(12) of the Act, statutory auditors are required to report to the central government about a fraud or suspected fraud committed against the company by the officers or employees of the firm. 

In a detailed guidance note on reporting on fraud by auditors under the Companies Act, the apex body of chartered accountants ICAI has said they should "apply professional skepticism" while dealing with such matters. 

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of 
India has said that such reporting needs to be done only if such frauds would have a material impact on the financial statements. 

"In case a fraud has already been reported or has been identified/detected by the management or through the company's vigil/whistle blower mechanism and has been/is being remediated/dealt with by them and such case is informed to the auditor, the latter will not be required to report the same ...," ICAI said in the note issued recently. 

This is because the auditor has not per se identified the fraud, it added. 

According to the note, the auditor should apply "professional skepticism" to evaluate whether the fraud was indeed identified in all aspects by the management or through the company's whistle blower mechanism. 

ICAI said that such an approach would help in making a between frauds identified due to matters raised by the auditor and those detected by company through its internal control mechanisms. 

Price Waterhouse's Partner Sumit Seth said the guidance note provides clarity on various aspects about reporting of fraud by auditors. 

He said: "It clarifies the definition of fraud, explains when and which frauds are to be reported, the manner of reporting including bringing in the concept of materiality which is fundamental to setting up an appropriate internal control system and audit. 

"...An auditor will report frauds to central government only if he is the first person to identify/note such fraud.



How a CA should Sign

Every time Auditors use the word Auditor's Report. It is the report to be Signed and Issued by Qualified Chartered Accountant who is in Practice. Without signing the report by the Chartered Accountant, it cannot be said that it is an "Auditor's Report"

A Chartered Accountant's pen is the Most Powerful tool. Now,ICAI issued some guidelines on the Manner of Signing of Certificates by Chartered Accountants.

The Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), at its 349th meeting held on 17th and 18th January, 2016 considered an issue relating to manner of signing of certificates by Chartered Accountants. The Council noted that presently different practices were in vogue in respect of the manner of signing of various certificates issued by the members of the ICAI.
On a consideration of the matter, the Council, with a view to bring uniformity in the manner of signing of certificates, has decided to require the members of the ICAI to include (in addition to any other requirements in this regard prescribed by the relevant law or regulation under which the certificate is being issued) the following details in their "Signatures" on the certificates issued by them:

Name of the CA firm* 
Firm Registration Number (FRN)* 
Name of the member Designation (Partner/Proprietor) 
Membership Number




PCAOB proposes significant changes to the auditor's report (No. 2013-40)
What's new?
On August 13, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB" or the "Board")proposed for public comment a new auditing standard, The Auditor's Report on an Audit of Financial Statements When the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion, and related amendments (the "proposed standard") that would require the auditor to disclose additional information in the auditor's report about the audit and the auditor. Among other matters, the proposed standard would require auditors to include in the audit report a discussion of critical audit matters ("CAM") specific to the audit.
The proposal follows up the PCAOB's 2011 Concept Release and public roundtable to seek the views of all stakeholders on potential changes to the auditor's report.
What are the key provisions?
The proposed standard would retain the existing pass/fail model and the basic elements of the auditor's report, but would require the auditor to report a wider range of information specific to the particular audit and auditor.
Communicating critical audit matters
The auditor would be required to communicate in a separate section of the audit report the CAM in the audit of the current period's financial statements based on the results of the audit or evidence obtained. It is expected that in most audits, the auditor would determine that there are CAM. CAM are those matters the auditor addressed during the audit of the financial statements that:
·         Involved the most difficult, subjective, or complex auditor judgments
·         Posed the most difficulty to the auditor in obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence
·         Posed the most difficulty to the auditor in forming an opinion on the financial statements
CAM ordinarily are matters of such importance that they are included in the matters required to be (1) documented in the engagement completion document; (2) reviewed by the engagement quality reviewer; (3) communicated to the audit committee; or (4) any combination of the three. It is not expected that each matter included in any one or more of these three sources would be a CAM. The proposed auditor reporting standard identifies factors the auditor should take into account in determining CAM including, for example:
·         The severity of control deficiencies identified relevant to the matter, if any
·         The nature and significance, quantitatively or qualitatively, of corrected and accumulated uncorrected misstatements related to the matter, if any
The auditor's report would (1) identify the CAM; (2) describe the considerations that led the auditor to determine that the matter is a CAM; and (3) refer to the relevant financial statement accounts and disclosures that relate to the CAM, when applicable.
Other proposals
Other provisions of the proposed standard would require:
·         A statement containing the year the auditor began serving consecutively as the company's auditor
·         A statement that the auditor is a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB (United States) and is required to be independent with respect to the company in accordance with the United States federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and the PCAOB
·         Enhancements to existing language in the auditor's report related to the auditor's responsibilities for fraud and the notes to the financial statements
·         Communication in the auditor's report related to other information pursuant to another new auditing standard that the PCAOB proposed concurrently, The Auditor's Responsibilities Regarding Other Information in Certain Documents Containing Audited Financial Statements and the Related Auditor's Report 
    Who's affected?
The proposed standard is applicable to audits conducted in accordance with PCAOB standards; however, the Board is soliciting comments on whether the proposed standard is appropriate for audits of brokers and dealers and audits of emerging growth companies (EGCs).
What's the proposed effective date?
The proposed standard would be effective, subject to approval by the SEC, for audits of financial statements for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2015.
What's next?
Comments on the proposed standard are due on December 11, 2013.




UID PORTAL for CERTIFICATION done by CAs in Practice


Dear All,
It for your information that a very welcome step has been initiated by ICAI. Now the UID portal for issuance of certificates by chartered accountants in practice is enabled and working

We should use this portal for issuance of certificates to avoid any fake certification and also to make certifications transparent and verifiable over internet.
Please use this portal and report any shortcomings / suggestions / bug in portal to Mr. Vivek Gupta, Assistant Secretary, EDP-IT Department, ICAI at his email id:vivek@icai.org

FAQ's for UID portal can be accessed at
http://online.icai.org/uid/FAQ-UID.pdf
Issued Certificates by CA's can be verified at
http://online.icai.org/searchudin.html

Also, please share this post so that it can reach our friends and members at large and they all can use it for betterment of quality of their services.


Compilation Engagements by Accounting and Audit Firms

Exposure Draft Standard on Related Services (SRS) 4410 (Revised) Compilation Engagements The ICAI has issued this exposure draft which deals with the practitioner’s responsibilities when engaged to assist management with the preparation and presentation of historical financial information without obtaining any assurance on that information, and to report on the engagement in accordance with this SRS. The exposure draft is open for public comments till 06 February 2014Read more



New companies Act 2013 :Cost Audit requirement and Board has to approve cost statements, including other statements to be annexed to the cost audit report before submission to auditors

Companies will now have to ensure that all statements annexed with the cost audit report are first approved by their board of directors before final submission.
Corporate Affairs Ministry, which is implementing the Companies Act, has amended the rules pertaining to cost records and audit in this regard.

Cost audit is mandatory for various classes of companies, including those in the areas of healthcare, construction and education.
As per the rules, cost auditor has to submit the cost audit report to the company's board of directors within 180 days from the close of a particular financial year.
Within 30 days of receiving the report, the company concerned has to submit the same to the ministry along with explanations about any "reservation or qualification" flagged by the cost auditor.
Now, the ministry has made it mandatory that any statement to be annexed with the cost audit report should be first approved by the company's board before being finalised.
"The cost statements, including other statements to be annexed to the cost audit report, shall be approved by the board of directors before they are signed on behalf of the board by any of the director authorised by the board, for submission to the cost auditor to report thereon," as per the revised rules.
Cost audit rules are applicable broadly on four classes of firms including those engaged in an industry regulated by a sectoral regulator or a central government ministry.
It would be in place for companies engaged in the production of goods in strategic sectors such as machinery and mechanical appliances used in defence.
Further, companies operating in areas involving public interest such as railways and firms that are into production, import and supply or trading of certain medical devices come under the cost audit rules.
Among the four categories, there are various thresholds for determining the requirement for maintaining cost records.


Removal of Cost Auditor

According to the ministry, a cost auditor can be removed before the term ends provided there is a board resolution. The entity or person concerned should be given reasonable opportunity to be heard besides recording the "reasons for such removal in writing".

Cost Audit under new Act  does not cover 96% of companies - ICWAI Institute

Suresh Chandra Mohanty, president of the cost accountants' institute, told Corporate Affairs Minister Sachin Pilot in a November 22 letter that the elected members of the institute may resign en masse if the ministry did nothing to protect its interests.

Cost accountants say they feel betrayed by the latest turn of events. An expert panel set up by the ministry in 2008 to review the cost audit mechanism had made certain recommendations about widening the scope of such checks. To start with, only 44 specific industries and businesses - in which administered prices, subsidies, regulation and strategic public interest are involved - had been covered by cost accountants. The field was enlarged through various notifications in 2011 and 2012 as per the suggestions of the expert committee.

However, draft rules issued by the ministry in November under the new Companies Act, roll back these changes. Mohanty described the draft rules as "de-facto withdrawal of recognition" in a November 23 press release.

By definition, this branch of accounting analyses costs such as raw material, wages and marketing that a company incurs and establishes a link with the profit margin it earns. In the process, companies get better clarity on costs, making them easier to control.

Cost accountants say the audit process helps authorities build authentic cost data on industries, which could be used in instances such as controlling drug prices, setting tariffs, plugging tax leakage or sniffing out fraud. Chartered accountants look at the company's books and validate the balance sheet.


Cost accountants feel that their utility won't be realised fully if more than 96% of the corporate sector is kept out of their purview as proposed in the latest draft rules. They believe cost audits play a critical role in ensuring good fiscal behaviour by querying company actions in detail.